KSL’s romance addiction story: Plagiarism, inspiration, and/or misdirection

Twitter was abuzz yesterday over an article at KSL.com which equated a woman’s desire to read romance novels with a man’s addiction to pornography. Unsurprisingly, romance readers were seriously annoyed, and a #romancekills hashtag was trending for much of the afternoon. Sarah Wendell wrote an excellent piece at Smart Bitches Trashy Books (now updated to include new information), and even MediaBistro paid attention.

KSL is part of a media company owned by the LDS (Mormon) church, which as far as I know has no outright ban on romance novels, although Mormon-friendly romances tend to limit the steam content. Therefore, while the article was annoying, it struck me as a predictable overreach by a conservative media outlet and I didn’t pay much attention to the kerfuffle. Last night, however, Carolyn Jewel pointed out that the article seemed to share a journalistically unhealthy relationship with a 2007 opinion piece in the Tucson Citizen that compared, you guessed it, romance reading and porn. I ran a document comparison using Copyscape (thanks Dhympna!) and discovered that several sentences were identical.

At first the copying looked like a cut-and-dried case of plagiarism, albeit a small amount. But when I looked more closely, I noticed that one sentence was a quote that had been used verbaim as a quote in the KSL piece. A second sentence from the opinion piece was presented as a quote from the opinion piece author in the KLS article. You can compare the two here and here.*

I am not a journalist, but is it considered appropriate to imply that a writer has interviewed the subject of a quote when she has only cut and pasted the subject’s written words from a different article (without attributing the source)? It seems pretty clear that Kimberly Sayer-Giles never interviewed either Slattery or Feldhaun but instead lifted their words from the original opinion piece by Feldhaun. But reading the article, it seems as if both had directly spoken (or emailed) with Sayer-Giles. And shouldn’t Feldhaun get credit as the author of the article which at the very least “inspired” the KSL story?


*This pdf is from a reprint of the article at GoUpstate.com, the site for the Spartanburg Herald-Journal. It has a Universal Press Syndicate tag, so I’m assuming it was properly licensed. The content is identical to the Citizen opinion piece.

7 thoughts on “KSL’s romance addiction story: Plagiarism, inspiration, and/or misdirection

    • Sorry, should have clarified. I meant that I wondered if the Atlanta Journal-Constitution was the place where Shaunti Feldhahn’s piece was originally published.

    • My guess is that all three papers subscribed to the Universal Press Syndicate, which provides a whole range of opinion columns. This op-ed may have been a standard feature with guests doing the point-counterpoint. The KSL writer dug it out and used it to kick off her column. She just didn’t attribute it.

      Here’s more info on UPS: http://www.uexpress.com/

  1. Pingback: Wednesday Midday Links: Plagiarism in Blogland | Dear Author

  2. All I have to say is that KSL doesn’t speak for the church, although sometimes it seems like it. IMO, this was a derivative fluff piece to drive traffic and it succeeded.

    Mormon-friendly romances tend to limit the steam content

    Well. They DID.

    And then I came along…

    • I completely agree that this was all about pageviews. And KSL doesn’t reflect all Mormons any more than any mouthpiece represents all the members. I imagine there were a lot of intelligent, thoughtful members of the Church cringing yesterday.

      I can’t wait to get to Stay in my TBR. It will probably make me blush.

Comments are closed.